What's new

+Jum+StoCh+ Profitable EA

3.10 star(s) 50 Votes
I have tried this EA, this is good in a consolidating market movement, but when the market moves in a one way trend, it will wipe out your account in no time, because it has no safety features yet, it just keep on grinding and opening trades.
 
i started a $2k live account on 15/02/2021 with the Jum Stoch v2.3 running on two pairs. will update my progress weekly for anyone interested.

First week results.

Balance up by 6.9%, pretty modest profits for the week given the low risk approach im taking. The balance drawdown was low at 3.5% but the equity fell at some point by 20%. you can check some of the stats below. Running two pairs only for at least a month then will add more as i monitor performance.


1613882853566.png
 
I bought this EA from Fiverr. The seller is no longer available so I'm hoping somebody here has experience with this EA and can help provide further support if needed. It looks like it was created by somebody named JumForex. If anyone here has experience with this EA, please share your results and recommended settings. Or if there is a newer version, please share.

The guy I bought the EA from provided his MT4 login to show the results, which are very impressive:
He started it with $1000 and it’s at over $20,000 now in just a few months.

FBS-Real-8
Login: 280425030
Password: Pass12345


---------------------
Instructions:
---------------------
Recommended pairs:
EURUSD
AUDUSD
EURJPY
USDJPY

Recommended Timeframe:
M15


I've tested this EA on a number of live accounts, and from my experience I recommend using 1 pair (2 max) per $1000 to start. The drawdown gets quite high at some points. You just need to use it safely and not get too greedy.

This is EA is fantastic, I just found someone using it
 
The Giant has fallen! The 'account referenced in the thread' which grew from $1k to $90k in one year closed trades with a loss of -$80k today. I applaud the account owner for his diamond hands which made him grow an account to such an extent. The risk was against him today. I think this is a big lesson in taking profits by withdrawing sometimes, esp with this martingale based EA which is kind of high risk. My current draw-down on the same EA is 16% because i am running only two pairs (which are less volatile) also using 0.01/$1000. Lets see how it goes.

Best wishes to you all.

Screenshot_20210225_184747_net.metaquotes.metatrader4.jpg
 
I bought this EA from Fiverr. The seller is no longer available so I'm hoping somebody here has experience with this EA and can help provide further support if needed. It looks like it was created by somebody named JumForex. If anyone here has experience with this EA, please share your results and recommended settings. Or if there is a newer version, please share.

The guy I bought the EA from provided his MT4 login to show the results, which are very impressive:
He started it with $1000 and it’s at over $20,000 now in just a few months.

FBS-Real-8
Login: 280425030
Password: Pass12345


---------------------
Instructions:
---------------------
Recommended pairs:
EURUSD
AUDUSD
EURJPY
USDJPY

Recommended Timeframe:
M15


I've tested this EA on a number of live accounts, and from my experience I recommend using 1 pair (2 max) per $1000 to start. The drawdown gets quite high at some points. You just need to use it safely and not get too greedy.
I was watching the account grow from around 45k back in January to today until I woke up and saw the equity in a deep deep minus. This happened before once when the account was sitting at around 55k, the equity went to - 46k but eventually made it back up. This time, today, the account was at 90k and the robot initiated a lot of sells for EURJPY with extremely risky lots. The equity went so deep into minus that it stopped out all of the trades. From $1000 portfolio about 8 months ago - to $90,000 late February - to a blown account of $3.09. Absolutely devastating. I hope this won't happen to anyone who's using these settings let alone this robot.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210225_131122_net.metaquotes.metatrader4.jpg
    Screenshot_20210225_131122_net.metaquotes.metatrader4.jpg
    474.4 KB · Views: 60
  • Screenshot_20210225_131133_net.metaquotes.metatrader4.jpg
    Screenshot_20210225_131133_net.metaquotes.metatrader4.jpg
    200.5 KB · Views: 51
I bought this EA from Fiverr. The seller is no longer available so I'm hoping somebody here has experience with this EA and can help provide further support if needed. It looks like it was created by somebody named JumForex. If anyone here has experience with this EA, please share your results and recommended settings. Or if there is a newer version, please share.

The guy I bought the EA from provided his MT4 login to show the results, which are very impressive:
He started it with $1000 and it’s at over $20,000 now in just a few months.

FBS-Real-8
Login: 280425030
Password: Pass12345


---------------------
Instructions:
---------------------
Recommended pairs:
EURUSD
AUDUSD
EURJPY
USDJPY

Recommended Timeframe:
M15


I've tested this EA on a number of live accounts, and from my experience I recommend using 1 pair (2 max) per $1000 to start. The drawdown gets quite high at some points. You just need to use it safely and not get too greedy.
this guy just blown his account with 90000 USD. this EA using Martingale has washed away his entire equity just now
 
The Giant has fallen! The 'account referenced in the thread' which grew from $1k to $90k in one year closed trades with a loss of -$80k today. I applaud the account owner for his diamond hands which made him grow an account to such an extent. The risk was against him today. I think this is a big lesson in taking profits by withdrawing sometimes, esp with this martingale based EA which is kind of high risk. My current draw-down on the same EA is 16% because i am running only two pairs (which are less volatile) also using 0.01/$1000. Lets see how it goes.

Best wishes to you all.

View attachment 15161
awwww that's so sad!, martingale is really a dangerous strategy, but why would he do multiple pair in such strategy?? adding pair meaning you are adding more risk 10 folds. he should have stick with one pair only,
 
I tested the robot and the strategy and did experiments with it in testing the strategy for four years and came to the conclusion that the minimum amount of expretes is either 100,000 dollars for one pair of euro dollars and the reversal within four years is 40%
Any use of 0.01 per 100,000 dollars or use of a cent account and I would encourage the use of a cent account
Of course, the withdrawal was 40% when using a 0.01 lot per $ 100,000
The important thing is to use a cent account for profit
 
I have been monitoring the account for two months and it was using 0.01 for every $ 5,000. Sure, the profit is high, but the risk is high, and this is what happened. The account lost all the money it made. It's sad.
Use 0.05 is incorrect according to my experiences. You should use 0.01 for every 100,000 dollars or you will pay at the end of the road.
 
awwww that's so sad!, martingale is really a dangerous strategy, but why would he do multiple pair in such strategy?? adding pair meaning you are adding more risk 10 folds. he should have stick with one pair only,

its a cent account from 10usd he and grewup to 900usd on cent account then blewup hes account why because the settings is on aggressive. he has double entries on aggressive mode thats why also double the DD.
 
he grew hes account from June 11 2020 to Feb 25 2021 from 10usd(cent = 1,000) to 900usd(cent = 90,000) and blew up because of highrisk settings which is the double entry. it will survive if he went to low risk settings only but with less profit.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210228-161319_MetaTrader 4.jpg
    Screenshot_20210228-161319_MetaTrader 4.jpg
    302.8 KB · Views: 75
  • Screenshot_20210228-161250_MetaTrader 4.jpg
    Screenshot_20210228-161250_MetaTrader 4.jpg
    283.5 KB · Views: 80
actually this EA is profitable, since it is a martingale strategy, you need to be strict in lot sizing, it is okay if you have smaller lot size because it is aggressive
 
actually this EA is profitable, since it is a martingale strategy, you need to be strict in lot sizing, it is okay if you have smaller lot size because it is aggressive

It is really safe with 2,000 and 0.01 lot size, less money starts to increase risk..!
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Similar threads

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks